August 31st, 2007 | Category: Curious Investments, Market Commentary |

Quiet week in the markets. As mentioned last week, I believe the markets are entering a testing period. We’ve had our correction and now we’re trying to figure out where to go from here. We’re between earnings cycles and there isn’t a lot of major economic data on the horizon so there are no big catalysts for broad market movement. It seems that people are done screaming about subprime and I believe that the Fed and its counterparts around the globe have done a good job of holding up the credit markets in the face of financial turmoil.

This week was not without note, however. Early in the week, we found that housing markets look as though they are very far from bottoming. Single family inventories home are up another 2% yoy to 4 million units while sales and prices dipped to a five-year low. Jobless claims were up this week in direct contradiction of expectations and it does seem that, at least domestically, we’re going to see a bit of a economic slow down. If you’re looking for new investments, look towards companies which are exposed globally and not just within the United States. As far as domestic retailers go, I would continue to steer towards quality and value and most definitely away from mass market and discount retailers as it would seem that most consumption troubles are stemming from the lower end of the consumer spectrum.

In the spotlight today was Ben Bernanke’s speech which marked the first time that the Fed truly acknowledged financial turmoil and seems to have shifted its focus, at least in the near term, towards smoothing out financial turmoil and weight near term developments a little heavier than it would normally. I think he’s played the game quite well over the last month and I am glad that he did reiterate his belief that the Fed is not meant for bailing out poor financial decisions but instead to act in support of the broader economy. And, believe me, there are broader implications to a rate cut than boosting stock prices and saving a few borrowers. If and when the housing market bottoms and the American economy starts chugging along again, you’ll be thanking Bernanke for not getting trigger happy and cutting rates and ushering in scary levels of inflation. For those worried about their homes and subprime mortages, President Bush and the Federal Government are planning on answering the call and it is from the perspective of fiscal policy that the subprime meltdown should be dealt with. I’m liking this two pronged - fiscal and monetary policy - approach very much and, for once, I’m voicing my support of how both the George Bush (read: Hank Paulson) and Ben Bernanke are handling the subprime situation. As shown by the rally today, I think investors agree as well. For those looking for advanced notice of how effective these two parties have been in soothing the markets, a good thing to keep an eye on is shifting investor and consumer confidence over the next few months.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Bernanke: No Bail Out for Lenders or Investors
$25 Billion for Everyone (ahem, Banks Only)
Read more on Federal Reserve, Subprime lending at Wikinvest
This entry was posted on Friday, August 31st, 2007 at 5:00 pm and is filed under Curious Investments, Market Commentary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



2 Responses to “August 27 - August 31, 2007: Week in Review”

  1. Spyros Says:

    quiet a memorable week indeed. i am not sure whether bernanke has promised a rate cut rather than just a sympathy to investors. in any case, if fed rates remain stable there would a lot of trouble again as market has more than priced in a 25 bps cut (most of the financial houses are mentioning a greater cut 50-75bps)

  2. Dan Hung Says:

    I think Bernanke was pretty clear in not promising a rate cut though I am not entirely sure that that is detrimental to the overall health of the market. Before the last Fed meeting a lot of people were also clamoring that the market had “priced in” a rate cut and when there was no rate cut but a mere statement that showed some capitulation, the market ended up rallying as opposed to selling off. Overall, a rate cut isn’t designed to stop the bleeding. Should homeowners and mortgage lenders need a bail out, this should come from the government on the fiscal policy side. A rate cut will take time to trickle through the system and changes the dynamic of the overall economy which can lead to undesired consequences outside of simply helping out those in financial distress over bad loans.

Leave a Reply

Name:      

Mail:        





Stocks

Currently Reading

Margin of Safety

My Book Reviews >>

Sponsors